Earlier this week, Bike to the Future asked our members/supporters to consider writing a letter of support for the new AT infrastructure projects. Thanks to everyone who has done so. It's certainly not too late to write.
Here are the 24 letters of support we've received:
I have to say that I feel safer, faster, more confident and I enjoy cycling more on all of the lanes/paths that I have been on compared to what was there before. So far I have ridden on Assiniboine, Grosvenor, Eugenie, Bannatyne, McDermot, Carlton, and Hargrave (some of which were painted last year) and they all seem to me to be well built and well thought out facilities.
I consider myself a confident and capable rider and I typically don't mind riding with traffic. But as I get older (i.e. not in my early, fearless 20s anymore) I find myself getting more cautions and gettin really upset when cars wizz by, five centimeters from my elbow. And now that I often have a child trailing behind me I am more aware than ever about the risks of cycling in and amongst car traffic. As such, I am more appreciative than ever of the bike lanes/paths that have been built in Winnipeg in that last two years. Even a painted line makes a world of difference, both for me and for the motorists around me. More advanced facilities, like the one along Assiniboine, are a dream to ride on, and I can only hope that the public will eventually appreciate the improvement that that level of design makes for higher-density neighbourhoods like Broadway-Assiniboine.
Keep up the good work!
MG
I am in full support of the 2010 $20M active transportation infrastructure! I am a recent Gordon Bell graduate and avid cyclist. Like many, I depend upon my bike as my only source of transport, and having the use of clearly marked lanes devoted to cyclists makes getting around the city safer and more enjoyable. I know many people, including myself, are overjoyed to see that the city is taking our safety to heart, please continue to make Winnipeg a bike friendly city.
MH
The lane on Maryland has been a pleasant surprise! Cars are staying away from the curb and it makes the commute so much better. Nothing yet on Sherbrook!
RP
The Yellow Ribbon Greenway in St James is just awesome.
As a community we were consulted – there were open houses.
The trail has brought people together – we are active, walking, talking and enjoying the trail.
A special thank you to City staff for all their efforts on our behalf.
CN
I have been a cyclist commuter for over 10 years now with rides varying from 10 km to 20 mi daily. I am also a resident of River Heights where the new bikeway infrastructure has been put in place.
I recognize the inherent flaws in having to fast track a project in order to be guaranteed time stamped federal funding, and that more public consultation and implementation time would be preferable. However, the new traffic circles that run along Grosvenor are a good idea and, I suspect once all adapt and learn how they function, will be a fixture city wide. I believe they are safer and more efficient. Further, I think it adds character to the neighbourhood and makes it a more interesting place to live. I encourage all to be patient both with the changes and with the vocal critics of these changes.
TW
I have been cycling to work Apr-Nov for the past 7 years, and cycling as my only mode of transport since I sold my car 5 years ago. This past week or so I have been trying to figure out what was going on out on the roads! I have never been honked, yelled at or had so many people take close calls in passing me before. I could also say there has been things yelled out at me, but for the most part I couldn't understand what the driver said exactly
In reading your message about extra anger out on the roads, I fully agree. I was wondering if it was just me, which didn't make much sense as I have not changed my cycling habits.
It will take time for some drivers to get over the fact that it's not all about them, let's just hope they keep in mind they are operating 2000 lbs+ machines and it's not a game out there.
I am an only parent and wish to travel to and from my job, and anywhere else I need to go safely and arrive alive. I don't feel that is too much to ask.
JB
I just wanted to add my support for the active transport initiatives in this city. I've been cycling, walking, bussing, and driving in Winnipeg for the last 23 years. I am thrilled with the new active transport trails in my part of the city, which is south St. Vital. I back onto one of the long-standing bike/walking trails that, until recently, was connected to nothing other than busy streets. Finally, I will have a way to easily access other bike/walking trails and can hardly wait until the Bishop Grandin/Kenaston trail is completed so that I can go from my home to Fort White or Assiniboine Park without having to navigate treacherous streets and traffic. The other proof of the value of these trails is extensive use they are already getting. I have never seen so many people out using these trails and enjoying some outdoor activities in a much more relaxed environment. Congratulations to the city planners and activists who have made this happen!
For those that complain that consultations were not conducted, that is not true. I attended such a consultation because I took the time to go and find out what was happening. Those that did not take the time should have no right to complain. I also encourage the city to continue to consider alternative forms of transportation in their future planning. Not all situations require the extensive construction of dedicated bikeways. Sometimes a simple modification such as a painted bike lane on a street can make a huge difference in safety. Keep up the good work!
AB
I have written through 311 and I look forward to hearing Judy this Friday.
KK
Hi Councillor Vandal,
Bike to the Future is probably one of those thorns in your side currently, advocating for the further progress of the proposed active transportation routes. They do an excellent job though, in educating those with open minds, about the positive aspects relating to the new routes we have in place.
My hope, is that you further endorse the Eugenie pathway, even though you may be hearing some complaints from motorists that use Eugenie as their through route to get to St.Mary's (and vice versa). I'm not sure if you've sat on Eugenie, either from 7:30-8:30am or 4:00-5:00pm, but there are SO many cyclists that use this route. There are so many cyclists, that if you're a cyclist yourself, you actually have to merge in with the existing bicycle traffic to start your day.
The motorists, on the other hand, I'm not sure what they're doing...
Are they racing the traffic on Marion/Goulet, from stop sign to stop sign? I'm not sure why they use a city block of Eugenie to test how fast their car can go from 0-60. The roundabouts will drastically reduce the stopping and squealing starts my wife tells me about every morning.
I haven't seen the beginning of any construction on my street, so I'm suspecting this particular active transportation project has either been cancelled altogether, or put on hold until the next construction season, when the city will no longer have the funding for any new active transportation routes.
Any feedback you might have relating to this little note would be greatly appreciated. Look fwd to hearing from you.
DJ
Maybe I am imagining things but during this morning's commute along Pembina it really felt like more motorists were passing leaving very little room for error. It was just after 7 AM and I was wearing a reflective jacket as well as a blinking red light so I think I was quite visible. Many passed me closely without slowing down at all and then looked in their rear view mirror to see if I was still upright. Maybe I was paranoid but I felt more vulnerable than usual.
I also bike along Sherbrook and Maryland and love "the line" on Maryland and now also Harrow. What a difference that makes. I have contacted the Free Press about that wonderful development.
LU
I caught a piece of your CBC radio interview regarding bicycle paths. Just wanted to let you know you did a good job and I think you're right. I was in Grant Park mall last winter and there were lots of folks going to the Active Transportation kiosk asking questions and taking away pamphlets. I think, yes, some folks will be be inconvenienced and, yes drivers, and likely cyclists, are on a bit of a learning curve, some business will take time to adapt but the long range benefits of having a more bicycle friendly city clearly outweigh the disadvantages. A few folks are upset because they did not understand what was going to happen until construction started but I suspect they are in the minority.
DC
As I was riding today, I have already been told to 'get off the road' by a huge truck who turned left beside me and almost hit me. It is therefore appropriate that I had submitted this letter to the Free Press, Judy, and Sam this morning:
Over the past couple weeks, I have read with great interest the debate raging over the bike lanes and traffic circles being erected in our city. In the fairness of full disclosure, I feel it necessary to state that my primary source of transportation is my bicycle with walking being a distant second.
What worries me most when pouring over the comments written by some readers is their disregard for the main reasoning behind these traffic changes. At the heart of the infrastructure improvements is safety. Safety for cyclists and safety for cars. It is so very disheartening to read that 'we should not be pandering to a minority of citizens when REAL problems can be fixed for REAL vehicles' (loose citation...). Because, in reality, whether or not cyclists represent less of the population is a moot point.
As a good friend of mine told me last week: 'the main role of government is to ensure the safety of all of its citizens'. When we propose to only make traffic improvements for the majority of road users, we are only reinforcing the unsafe conditions I encounter daily across this city. The proposed changes to our roads will help to alleviate the hazards associated to cycling, and will mitigate some of the irritations drivers seem to feel when encountering cyclists on the road. This is turn makes our streets better for all users.
And while I believe that active transportation needs to be given priority status by all levels of our government for many reasons I have not stated here, what I really wish to underline is that the palpable division between drivers and cyclists in this city does nothing but support a toxic environment on our roads. Winnipeg's road system has fallen behind the times. Let's work together by inviting change and aiming to make our streets safer. Bike lanes and traffic circles are a great step in that direction.
Keep fighting the good fight!
MC
I'm one of the Winnipegers who is very happy with the new active transportation initiatives currently being developed. Our city has lagged behind other Canadian cities in this regard and it's about time we caught up.
Unfortunately many of the nay sayers in Winnipeg will not be converted till gas is at least $3 a litre.
KP
Just a quick note to let you know that I have found the motorists on Broadway during rush hour to be particularly unfriendly lately. Likely due to the closure and changes being made to Assiniboine. Nothing serious, but a noticeable difference nonetheless.
CJ
I just got back from a trip to Barcelona and Catalonia. It was my first time driving in Europe, and especially with roundabouts. I found they were very easy to learn and very safe. I was very pleased with the way they allowed traffic to proceed with almost no stop signs. The traffic was calm and there was no horn-honking or excessive speeds (almost of my driving was outside Barcelona). I say this from the perspective of a car driver. The roundabouts work.
Also, I have decided to ride bikes in every city I visit. I have been lucky in the past 15 years or so to have ridden in Regina, Edmonton, Vancouver, Montreal, Quebec City, Niagara-on-the-Lake, Chicago, New York, San Francisco, Davis (California) and Barcelona. EVERY one of those cities has significantly superior bike infrastructure to Winnipeg's. Every one of those cities has very long, waterfront separate bike lanes (maybe not Quebec City or Davis so much). Every one of those cities has far more bike trails than Winnipeg. (See article on top bike friendly cities in the world: www.virgin-vacations.com/11-most-bike-friendly-cities.aspx)
I ride my bike to work all year long in Winnipeg. I am very appreciative for the improvements that I see happening with Winnipeg's bike trails. (I especially enjoyed riding on the river last winter - thanks to the The Forks!) Of course more can always be done, and I expect to see bike trail additions in EVERY year's capital budget. In Riverview, we have seen some new roundabouts installed. My wife and I and our neighbours are very pleased, both from a car driving and bike riding perspective.
Winnipeg is on to a good thing, even if we are a bit late to the party - biking has everything going for it - active living, good for the environment, reduction of noise and traffic, lower infrastructure costs, lower vehicle costs and increased safety.
Keep up the good work Bike to the Future, Winnipeg Trails Association and the City of Winnipeg!
TM
I have been a spring-summer-fall cyclist for 10+ years and have strategically avoided busy thoroughfares like Portage Avenue whenever possible. When the diamond lanes first opened, I cycled down Osborne Street and was run out the lane by a UPS truck. I had been skittish about using them ever since. Recently I had errands which took me along Portage Avenue. Watching the traffic flows, I decided that I would take a chance again on the diamond lane as drivers appeared to be respecting the lanes. What a treat to move with the traffic flow on Portage without worrying about being mowed down by cars (and especially trucks) weaving in and out of the parking lane. Thanks for moving cyclists from third class citizen to legitimate users of city streets!
JO
To: LThomas@winnipeg.ca, ragiesbrecht@shaw.ca, robinsoncampaign@gmail.com, judywl@mts.net, 311@winnipeg.ca
Greetings,
I am writing to show my support for the active transportation projects currently scheduled/underway in Winnipeg. I am, at varying times, a cyclist, motorist, and pedestrian and believe that everything possible needs to be done to encourage active transportation in Winnipeg, as cycling and walking are often dangerous in this city.
As a frequent pedestrian on Pembina Hwy, I have been at risk numerous times of being hit by motorists turning in/out of businesses along that street, who feel they have the right-of-way simply because they are motorists. The only reason I have not been hit is because I was able to get out of the way fast enough. I have been disgusted to see things like motorists sounding their horns as an elderly woman with a walker attempted to cross Pembina Hwy at a light, and was unable to complete her crossing before the light changed. Walking along such streets is unpleasant with the scream of traffic in your ears and I have been soaked numerous times by motorists speeding through puddles in the curb lane. Laws about such things are ineffective if they are not enforced. This is not exclusive to Pembina Hwy, as major streets such as Regent Ave, and Henderson Hwy have similar issues.
I am pleased to see work underway on various bike paths throughout the city towards the goal of a linked network. As a relatively "new" cyclist I have found it frustrating to bike along bike paths which mysteriously end, dumping cyclists onto the sidewalk where it is officially illegal to cycle (The bikepath along Dunkirk/Fermor for example).
In choosing to cycle in Winnipeg, I put my physical well-being at risk due to both the potential for accidental and purposeful collisions with motorists--and I fully believe that many collisions are purposeful on the part of motorists. While I have found the majority of motorists to be respectful, I have been in situations where I feared for my life, such as the time where a large semi-trailer attempted to force me off the road in full daylight as I cycled to buy groceries on Bison Drive, his trailer not more than 18 inches from my shoulder. I am aware of a number of individuals who have found themselves in similar situations where they have been forced off the road and even knocked off their bikes in collisions with motorists (who have then proceeded to get out of the car to scream at the "offending" cyclist who was then biking predictably in the curb-lane on Pembina Hwy and hit by the vehicle which passed too closely).
Cyclists dangerously disobeying traffic laws (biking the wrong way along streets, driving unpredictably between sidewalks and roadways) need to be ticketed for their disregard of the law, but motorists endangering cyclists are the ones that need to be penalized most severely for their disregard of both laws and people's lives.
Cycling in Winnipeg, a viable alternative for most individuals for 6-8 months out of the year even in our Winter city (and year-round for the hardy), should be encouraged in our city for it's ability to alleviate traffic gridlock, and improve the environment and the health of our citizens. Active transportation also has the potential to make our city a friendlier and safer place--on a bicycle (or out walking) you're likely to smile at and acknowledge those around you--and I know that the people out walking in my Glenelm neighbourhood on a daily basis make me feel far more secure, as well as providing me with a way to get to know my neighbours in an increasingly anonymous society.
Please help make Winnipeg a safe place for the cyclists and pedestrians who put themselves at risk to improve our environment and our city and continue the support of our Active Transportation network.
JL
I just want to help support the bike paths. I love the bike paths and believe that they're great for encouraging physical activity among multiple ages. They allow a safe and peaceful place to relax and learn more about the local neighborhood. With the use of the 2009 bike map, I have learned a lot about Winnipeg, that born 'Winnipegers' may have never heard of. I have been able to explore more of the city with the bike paths. The routes take you away from the busy streets and immerse you in a beautiful scenery to take you to you're destination. Everyone encountered on the trails looks so happy and it makes my day.
KC
Today I enjoyed my most pleasant bike commute in 22 years. Since 1988, I have been riding my bike back and forth to Health Sciences Centre, north on Sherbrook in the morning and south on Maryland in the evening. It is a busy route and is frequently fraught with unexpected and sometimes dangerous situations for both cyclists and drivers alike.
Today, as I turned south onto Maryland, I was pleasantly surprised to find a newly painted white line designating a bike lane that parallelled the west curb lane and ran south from Notre Dame to the Maryland Bridge. What a difference a painted line can make! The cars and trucks respectfully stayed on their side; I kept to my side, and all moved smoothly together in a safe and organized homeward commute.
That thin white line created a win-win situation. The vehicles still had three lanes, but now I also had my own space. Both drivers and cyclists seemed more relaxed since both now knew how they were expected to share the road. It was remarkable. And all thanks to the hard work of all those involved in making Winnipeg's active transportation initiative a reality -- and a thin white line.
CH
I sent this to the Free Press:
Do not look a gift horse in the mouth!
This used to be a popular expression when we rode around on horses in the city. Now that we have advanced to a new age we need to invent an expression for those that oppose the bike paths. I have never heard more whining and complaining then from what should be the most environmentally friendly part of Winnipeg. The city had their public forums and info sessions and they were well advertised and surprise - nobody showed up. I travel on an electric bike so that I can avoid dangerous paved shoulder and I dreamed of the day that the city would add bike paths to lower the probability of being hit by some irate driver. When the info sessions for the Bishop Grandin to Kenaston bike path was planned only two people showed up - me and another gal who was complaining about - I think mosquitoes. I had inquired at a local bike shop in the area - because I thought that they would want it going by their shop - they were aware of the meeting but indicated that any path anywhere would be a plus. This appeared to be the general consensus of most people that I spoke with in the area. At least when the city builds something - they are making it safe for those that chose to be environmentally friendly - and I hope they make it safe for those building the environmentally friendly infrastructure - hats off to the city workers - and watch out for those irate drivers (and lawyers!).
Thanks for letting me know……
DS
Maybe I am imagining things but during this morning's commute along Pembina it really felt like more motorists were passing leaving very little room for error. It was just after 7:00 AM and I was wearing a reflective jacket as well as a blinking red light so I think I was quite visible. Many passed me closely without slowing down at all and then looked in their rear view mirror to see if I was still upright. Maybe I was paranoid but I felt more vulnerable than usual.
I also bike along Sherbrook and Maryland and love "the line" on Maryland and now also Harrow. What a difference that makes. I have contacted the Free Press about that wonderful development.
KY
Before we complain too much about traffic circles, it is important that we realize the considerable benefits they offer.
They are good for the environment. Four-way stops, on the other hand, are not. Instead of forcing traffic to stop, traffic circles generally allow traffic to keep rolling through if there is no vehicle in sight.
They involve the driver in problem solving. Having spent many hours in the nightmare that was Winnipeg traffic this summer, I realize that my main frustration comes from the plague of four-way stop signs and traffic signals that infest this city. At least a traffic circle credits me with some intelligence. I can move through an intersection without stopping if conditions warrant.
Traffic circles slow down vehicles by their very nature, but they also keep traffic moving in a slow, orderly fashion without the need for a complicated traffic-light system -- thus earning another environmental stamp of approval.
They have the potential to be pretty. Planting flowers or plants in the middle of a traffic circle (Europeans go so far as to have fountains) can make them quite attractive. When is the last time you could say that about a stop sign or a traffic light?
They are safe: I have driven a lot in the Netherlands, and it has many, many traffic circles installed. The Netherlands is 1/17th the size of Manitoba but has more than 13 times the number of vehicles packed into it. I frequently drove to Dutch addresses inside towns and encountered no stop signs the whole distance. Only traffic circles. And I should point out that the Netherlands has one traffic fatality per year for every 28,000 people. We have one traffic fatality per year for every 12,000 people.
KP
I want to thank the city planners, engineers, and construction crews for trying to make our city more cycling friendly. As for the citizens that have been complaining about the projects, shame on you. If these construction projects were only for road improvements you would be complaining about them, too. If there was no construction at all then you would be complaining that our roads are falling apart. Maybe you complainers should ride your bike (if you own one) to work and see things from the other side. As for the candidates for mayor; I too am a voter and there are a lot of us cyclist who are in favor of active transportation infrastructure program.
Construction will always be a part of revitalizing our city and we, as Winnipeggers, should be used to it by now. Once these projects are completed it will be everyone, including your children, that will benefit from the new bike routes.
MB
Stop criticizing the consultation process. Stop criticizing city staff and consultants. Get on with the job of putting federal infrastructure money to work building badly needed bike and pedestrian facilities.
Shame on Judy Wasylycia-Leis for suggesting that the Assiniboine Bikeway be halted. Double shame on Mayor Sam Katz for criticizing city staff. I found city staff involved in active transportation to be knowledgeable and helpful people who made a considerable effort with a complex consultation process.
The construction season is coming to a close. Federal infrastructure money is coming to an end next March. There has been planning, there has been press coverage, there has been consultation and there has been opportunity for feedback. Now is the time to take the plan and the money and finish the job. It is not the time to be indecisive and throw away federal money.
The benefits of having our cities and neighbourhoods accessible by active transportation are legion and well-documented. You don't have to go to Paris for innovative, scenic and functional cycling trails, a public bike rental system, rapid transit where you can roll your bike on and hang it up, and vacation destinations where the cycling infrastructure is a major part of the attraction.
Go no further than Minnesota, in general, and Minneapolis in particular. Winnipeg has been making great progress in active transportation lately and if the municipal politicians will stay out of the way and let the planners, consultants and builders spend the federal money to finish the job, we can make Winnipeg a place where more people want to work, live and vacation.
DP